Grammar for including but not limited to
WebSep 2, 2015 · Then there’s the question of verbosity: five words ( including but not limited to) or eight words ( including without limiting the generality of the foregoing) in place of a single word: including. Verbosity brings down the dark cloud of obscurity over the legal instrument as a whole. Drafters who use these phrases are typically addicted to ...
Grammar for including but not limited to
Did you know?
WebMar 17, 2005 · I think a lot of it comes from a specifying engineer's reluctance to spend time changing something, no matter if it is archaic or redundant. Hours are either billable or wasted in some firms. "Such as..." is so much more succinct and specific than "Including but not limited to..." Generalizations can cause grief too. WebOct 17, 2016 · The recommended punctuation for ultimate clarity would therefore be the following: “There are many activities including, but not limited to, running, jumping, and swimming.”. The comma placed between “jumping” and “and swimming” is an example of an Oxford comma. It could be excluded as well, resulting in the following: “There are ...
WebSep 2, 2015 · The best simple solution is to define including as meaning “including but not limited to” in every legal instrument in which the word is used—among the … WebFeb 2, 2024 · “Including but not limited to” is an idiomatic expression commonly occurring in contracts. The phrase means that the definition is applicable to examples …
WebJun 4, 2024 · The set of primitive actions these agents can perform include but are not limited to move, attach and clear. First I thought adding commas would do the trick, i.e.: … WebThe "not limited to" prevents someone from trying to argue that their item doesn't fit under any of the categories, because WalMart can just say that doesn't matter, because the things that have 15-day return windows aren't limited to this list - it's just a list of several categories that do have 15-day return windows, but things not on the ...
WebOct 13, 2015 · As general the required fields would be marked with an asterisk (*). Here comes the dilemma: There are some fields in the form which are required, but as a group(e.g 3.a/3.b/3.c). It's unnecessary to fill out all of them, is there any solution to express the meaning of 'at least one, but not limited?'.
WebDec 10, 2014 · The phrase "to include" means to only use, review, or execute the list (or series of things) that come immediately after said phrase. If you use "including" in the sentence, this would imply using, reviewing, and/or executing the item (or list of items) that came before and after the "including" insert. Share. hill and brooks teaWebPrior to beginning my tertiary education, I had experience performing in a multitude of live events. Through these opportunities, I have performed … hill and clark spaldingWebAug 27, 2015 · That’s exactly the point. Problems with including can be avoiding if you don’t use it to list obvious members of the class but instead use it just to bring within the class stuff lurking at the gray edges.. But sometimes you have to list obvious members of the class, because of client nervousness. If that’s the case, then a formula such as that … hill and associates lubbockWebKEY TAKEAWAYS. “Including” rarely requires a comma. You should only include a comma before “including” when it is the first word of a non-essential clause, e.g. “this, including that, is correct.”. Here are a few more examples to demonstrate how this works: Matt’s friends, including Billy, decided playing a few pranks on him would ... hill and brooks coffee and teaWebAug 19, 2010 · Lemonizer apparently wanted to omit the word "is" from the phrase " includes but is not limited to" and the boss apparently insisted that the word "is" was necessary for that particular wording. I agreed with the boss: The word "is" should be there. The word "is" is not necessary if the wording is changed to " including but not limited to". hill and clarkWebAnother way to say “including but not limited to” is “some options are.”. This expression has a more casual tone. Therefore, it’s best used when communicating with colleagues … hill and brooks coffee companyWebSemicolon is not grammar, at least not in the strictest terms. – Kris. Apr 15, 2014 at 14:24 @Kris note that I never said "including but not limited to" is always redundant. I said it's redundant in this case because of the aforementioned "every possible accessory". – … hill and clark limited