Fatehraj singhvi vs union of india
WebDec 28, 2024 · In Rajeev Suri v Union of India, the SC adopted a deferential approach vis-à-vis the Executive regarding policy matters. In 2024, the Supreme Court issued 865 … Webn prepared u s 200A of the Act up to 31st May 2015, the late filing fee u s 234E of Act cannot be charged while processing the TDS return statement because enabling clause (c) of sub section (1) of section 200A have been inserted w.e.f. 01.06.2015 and before this amendment w.e.f 01.06.2015 there was
Fatehraj singhvi vs union of india
Did you know?
WebNavtej Singh Johar & Ors. v. Union of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice (2024) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that decriminalised all … WebMar 6, 2024 · The Supreme Court in NALSA v Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438 and Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, (2024) 10 SCC 1 held that discrimination on the ground of …
WebOct 28, 2024 · The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) The two-member bench of Rahul Chaudhary (Judicial Member) and M. Balaganesh (Accountant Member) has relied on the decision of Karnataka in the case of Fatehraj Singhvi Vs.Union of India in which it was held that the notice under Section 200A of the Income Tax Act … WebThe Mumbai tribunal has deleted the late fee levied under Section 234E of the Act in respect of the quarterly TDS statements filed for the financial years…
WebA) The Union Government on Friday notified India International Arbitration Centre (Criteria for Admission to the panel of arbitrators) Regulations, 2024. B)… WebJan 4, 2010 · This judgment does not cite any other record. SRI.FATHERAJ SINGHVI, v. UNION OF INDIA Karnataka High Court Aug 26, 2016. SRI.FATHERAJ SINGHVI, v. …
WebOct 28, 2024 · The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the levy of late fees of INR 40,000 related to the period of the tax deduction prior to …
WebDec 10, 2024 · Now, the assessee is in further appeals before your hounour as this issue is no longer re integra since the Honble Karnataka High Court in Fatehraj Singhvi V. union of Inida (289 CTR 0602) has held that w.e.f 01.06.2015, the Parliament by way of an amendment to Sec. 200A of the Act, has empowered the AO to levy fee u/s 234E of the … regan\u0027s fatherWebFeb 25, 2024 · At the outset itself, it was pointed out by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that this issue is no longer res integra since the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in Fatehraj Singhvi v. Union of India has held that w.e.f. 01.06.2015, the Parliament by way of an amendment to Section 200A of the Act, has empowered the AO to levy fee u/s 234E of … regan\u0027s motivated fitness bostonWebJan 6, 2015 · Chapter XVII inserted in the Negotiable Instruments Act, containing Sections 138 to 142, came into force on 01.04.1989. Dishonour of cheques for insufficiency of … regan\u0027s fish and chips whittonWebShree Narayana Guru Smaraka Sangam Vs. Union of India W.P. CO No.30229 of 2013 order dated 14.12.2016 has taken a view that even ... Karnataka High Court in the case of Fatehraj Singhvi (supra ... probiotics and cfsWebAug 27, 2024 · facts in Fatehraj Singh vs..Union of India (supra), which was decided by Hon'ble Karnataka High Court was that for financial year 2012-13 and 2013-14, TDS was … regan\u0027s nursery fremontWebMay 29, 2024 · M. Nagaraj v. Union of India was decided by the Supreme Court in 2006. The Court upheld Parliament’s decision to expand SC/ST reservations should include … regan\u0027s furniture dickson tnWebSep 26, 2024 · List of Overruled Cases: Overruled by: National Building Material Supply Vs. Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal, AIR 1965 All 586 Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal Vs. National … regan\u0027s motivated fitness